Past Presentations and Public Meetings
Albany residents who want to know what has been discussed related to transportation funding discussions at City Council and other public meetings can find it here. Details from the ongoing discussions are linked here. Information will be updated as it becomes available.
Date | Memos | Presentations | Minutes | Video |
---|---|---|---|---|
September 25, 2024 (Street Maintenance Fee Ordinance) | n/a | n/a | Minutes | Video |
August 7, 2024 (Street Maintenance Fee Ordinance) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
July 22, 2024 (Public Opinion Research) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
June 26, 2024 (Funding Discussion) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
January 22, 2024 (Funding Alternatives) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
December 11, 2023 (Funding Alternatives) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
November 6, 2023 (Funding Overview) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
October 9, 2023 (Pavement 101) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
August 7, 2023 (Transportation Discussion Kick Off Meeting) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | Video |
October 9, 2019 (Potential General Obligation Bond for Street Projects) | Memo | Minutes | ||
August 26, 2019 (Potential General Obligation Bond for Street Projects) | Memo | Minutes | ||
June 10, 2019 (Public Outreach Summary, Funding Alternatives, Continued) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | |
February 21, 2018 (Local Fuel Tax Discussion) | Memo | Resolution 6666 | Minutes | |
November 29, 2017 (Street Funding Discussion) | Presentation | Minutes | ||
November 8, 2017 (Street Funding Alternatives, Continued) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | |
July 24, 2017 (Mayor's Report on HB2017) | Minutes | |||
May 8, 2017 (Local Fuel Tax Initiative Process) | Memo | Minutes | ||
March 20, 2017 (Street Funding Alternatives) | Presentation | Minutes | ||
February 6, 2017 (Pavement Condition Assessment) | Memo | Presentation | Minutes | |
January 23, 2017 (Types of pavement failures, Pavement Condition Indexes, Pavement preservation techniques, and Least life cycle cost strategies) | Presentation | Minutes | ||
July 11, 2016 (Local gas tax) | Memo | Minutes |
- Details
Q & A
Is the City Council evaluating the entire transportation system?
Yes, but only for pavement condition for arterial, collector, and local streets owned and maintained by the city. Other transportation system needs are studied separately, such as the Transportation System Plan that identifies needs such as safety and capacity improvements. Many of the improvements are currently unfunded.
What are arterial and collector streets and why are they a high priority?
Arterials are transportation corridors that generally have high traffic volumes and provide for trips of moderate to extended length. They provide connections to regional transportation routes. Examples are Waverly Drive, Queen Street, North Albany Road, and the State highway system.
Collectors gather and channel traffic from local streets to the arterial network. They provide a combination of local access and through movements. Examples are Marion Street, Jackson Street, Price Road, and Crocker Lane.
Local streets are low traffic volume roads that provide direct access to abutting land, such as the street in front of your house. They are not intended for long-distance through movements.
What is the condition of Albany's streets?
Albany completes pavement condition assessments about every five years. Each street segment is evaluated on a scale of 0-100 to determine its Pavement Condition Index (PCI); zero is the worst, 100 is the best condition. Albany's most recent condition assessment was completed in 2021. The City's system-wide average PCI is 63, considered "fair." The current average PCI for only arterials and collectors is 71. See Condition of Albany's Streets for more discussion.
What is the target PCI for arterial and collector streets?
The City Council defined an objective under Goal Two of the Great Neighborhoods Theme in Albany’s strategic plan to “Utilize available street funding to maintain arterial and collector streets to a minimum Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score of 60…” This target was selected by balancing desired levels of service, anticipated costs, and the fact that providing routine maintenance (i.e. overlays, etc.) is the most economical was to preserve a street. See Pavement Condition Goals and What That Costs for more information. No minimum PCI has been set for local streets.
How much will it cost to maintain each arterial and collector street at or above PCI 60?
The estimated amount required to meet this goal is:
- $4 million a year (2023 dollars) to adequately maintain all arterials and collectors at or above PCI 60
- $3.5 million a year (2023 dollars) to adequately maintain all local streets currently in good and fair condition at or above PCI 60.
- $8.3 million a year (2023 dollars) to reconstruct and maintain all local streets currently in poor condition at or above PCI 60.
Costs are in 2023 dollars. Construction costs will increase over time. See Pavement Condition Goals & What That Costs for more information.
How much money is available for pavement maintenance? Do we have enough to meet the PCI goal?
The funding gap is substantial. Current funding falls short of the required $12.8 million annual investment calculated to maintain streets at or above PCI 60. (2023 dollars)
See Pavement Condition Goals and What That Costs for more information.
How did the streets get in this condition and why isn't enough money available to fix them?
All streets deteriorate over time. Lots of Albany streets are in poor condition. Funds are required to rebuild streets that have failed and to fund routine major maintenance such as overlays for streets that are in fair condition. Smaller, incremental improvements like crack sealing and periodic overlays are the least expensive way to preserve streets.
Over the years, Albany has considered various ways to pay for increased street work. Albany voters turned down a local fuel tax in 1982, 1991, and 2018. A general obligation bond in 1998 paid for reconstruction of parts of Elm Street, 34th Avenue, Santiam Road, Fifth Avenue, Salem Avenue and the southern portion of North Albany Road. Similar bond measures failed in 1995 and 2000. A transportation utility has been considered several times but not implemented due to concerns of overburdening citizens with utility fees.
What are some potential funding alternatives for maintaining streets?
Several alternatives can be considered. Each has benefits and drawbacks. Some alternatives rely on increased fees or taxes paid by Albany residents while others rely on budgeting decisions that could impact other City services. A combination of options may be needed to generate enough revenue to make meaningful street improvements. These include:
- General Fund
- Franchise fees
- In-lieu-of franchise fees
- Stormwater service charges
- Fuel tax
- Transportation utility
- General Obligation bonds
- Local improvement district (LID)
See Potential Funding Alternatives for more information.
Is the City pursuing any of these funding alternatives?
While voters turned downed a local fuel tax in 2018, the City Council has provided direction to raise stormwater service charges over time so that the stormwater utility is paying for stormwater improvements constructed with street projects. This will allow the City to complete more street maintenance work. However, if roads are going to be maintained, even at current levels, additional sources of revenue need to be identified. Without additional funding, streets will continue to deteriorate until the only options are to let them fall apart or rebuild them.
Don't my property taxes pay for street maintenance?
No. Property taxes are not used for street maintenance. Property tax revenues for the City of Albany help pay for the police and fire departments and our libraries. Redirecting substantial amounts of property tax money to streets could reduce police and fire protection and limit library services.
The City's General Fund receives revenue from sources other than property taxes; the City Council has discussed but not decided whether any should be used for streets.
Do other communities in Oregon charge for street maintenance?
Yes. Oregon communities have implemented various mechanisms to fund street maintenance. Local fuel taxes, transportation utilities, and general obligation bonds are the most common.
More than 32 cities in Oregon have fuel taxes that range from a penny to ten cents per gallon. Transportation utilities are used in 26 Oregon cities, with the monthly residential fee ranging from $2.85 to $16.81. More information can be found in the December 11, 2023, Council memo and presentation on the Past Presentations and Public Meetings page.
I couldn't find the answers to my questions. Who can I contact to get my questions answered?
- Details
Potential Funding Alternatives
Transportation systems need more than good pavement on arterial, collector, and local streets. Bicyclists, pedestrians and people with disabilities need to be able to use streets safely, and all street systems need to plan for carrying more traffic as communities grow. Albany and most other Oregon communities have struggled to meet these needs for decades and have used alternative methods to support their transportation systems including local fuel taxes, general obligation (property tax) bonds, and transportation utilities. The Albany City Council considered all of these options and others in December 2023. Attachment to the December 11, 2023 Council memo provides a discussion of each:
- General fund
- Franchise fees
- City Services fee
- In-lieu-of franchise fees
- Stormwater service charges
- Fuel tax
- Transportation utility
- General Obligation bonds
- Loans
- Tax Increment Financing
- Local improvement district (LID)
A combination of options may be needed to generate enough revenue to make meaningful improvements to Albany's streets.
Visit Past Presentations and Public Meetings to see memos, presentations, and meeting minutes for recent City Council discussions about Albany's streets.
- Details
Pavement Condition Goals and What That Costs
Improving and maintaining Albany's streets costs more than what is currently available to do the work. Since arterial and collector streets serve most Albany residents, visitors, and commercial traffic, we are evaluating their condition, setting maintenance goals and looking for ways to cover the cost. Local streets also require maintenance; setting goals and deciding how to pay for fixing them are pending.
One objective under Goal Two of the Great Neighborhoods Theme in Albany’s Strategic Plan is to “Utilize available street funding to maintain arterial and collector streets to a minimum Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score of 60…” No minimum PCI has been set for local streets. This target was selected by balancing desired levels of service, anticipated costs, and the fact that providing routine maintenance (i.e. overlays, etc.) is the most economical way to preserve a street (see Keeping Pavement in Good Shape and Why That's Important).
Albany is responsible for approximately 21.3 miles of arterial. 25.4 miles of collector streets, and 143 miles of local streets. The average PCI for arterials and collectors is 71, slightly better than the entire City street system average of 63. The average PCI for local streets is 59. Arterials. collectors, and local streets that are under Albany's jurisdiction are shown in the next map.
What funding is available now?
About $3 million on average (2023 dollars) is available from a variety of sources each year for Albany street projects. Some of the money is restricted to specific purposes, and other funds are not guaranteed to be available every year. Historically, the cost to construct storm drainage improvements has been included in street projects. Adoption of a stormwater fee in 2015, and City Council’s decision to adjust stormwater fees to account for inflation and increased construction costs has provided more money for the stormwater system, freeing up those street funds to be used on street work.
Additionally, Keep Oregon Moving, Oregon House Bill 2017, passed in the summer of 2017, has raised the state gas tax incrementally resulting in additional revenue to Albany and other cities. The Oregon Department of Transportation has estimated that Albany will receive $1.7 million by 2025, at which point the increased revenue resulting from HB2017 will level off.
Funding Gap
Arterial and Collector Streets have had the benefit of being the focus of virtually all available capital funding, consistent with a city council goal to keep arterial and collector PCI ratings above 60. As a result of this targeted investment, the current average PCI for arterial and collector streets is 71. In order to maintain arterial and collector streets in good or fair condition over the long term, it is estimated that an average investment of $4 million per year (2023 dollars) is needed. Currently, the city is spending on average $2.5 million per year leaving a funding gap of $1.5 million.
Local streets have generally not received adequate street maintenance funding. There are 54 miles of local streets (38 percent) in good condition, however, most of these are located in newer neighborhoods. There is an almost equal number of local streets, 52 miles (37 percent), in poor condition that continue to decline without adequate funding. An estimated investment of $3.5 million per year (2023 dollars) on average will be needed to maintain local streets currently in good or fair condition. Currently the city is spending on average $500,000 on these roads, mostly through the slurry seal program. For local roads currently in poor condition, an estimated investment of $8.3 million per year (2023 dollars) over a 40 year time period is needed to rebuild these streets and get them back into good condition. The city is currently not spending any capital funds on local streets in poor condition. The overall combined funding gap for local streets is $11.3 million per year, and the combined street annual funding gap is $12.8 million.
Arterials and Collectors | $1,500,000 |
Locals – Good and Fair Condition | $3,000,000 |
Locals – Poor Condition | $8,300,000 |
TOTAL | $12,800,000 |
Available funding falls short of the required $12.8 million (2023 dollars) annual investment. Potential funding alternatives will be discussed at future Transportation Advisory Commission meetings and Council Work sessions.
- Details
Condition of Albany's Streets
Albany's most recent street condition assessment was in 2021. Overall, Albany streets averaged a PCI of 63, considered "fair." Assessment results for 2021 are summarized here:
See Keeping Pavement in Good Shape and Why That's Important to learn about PCIs
2021 Condition Assessment Results
Pavement Condition | Arterial | Collector | Local | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Miles | % | Miles | % | Miles | % | |
Good (100-80 PCI) | 4.3 | 20.1% | 10.4 | 41.1% | 54.1 | 37.8% |
Fair (79-50 PCI) | 16.7 | 78.3% | 11.7 | 46.3% | 36.8 | 25.7% |
Poor (49-0) | 0.3 | 1.6% | 3.2 | 12.6% | 52.3 | 36.5% |
Total | 21.3 | 100% | 25.4 | 100% | 143.2 | 100% |
Note: Miles refers to total road miles from the 2021 condition assessment.
Visit Past Presentations and Public Meetings to see memos, presentations, and meeting minutes for recent City Council discussions about Albany's streets.
- Details